Recently, the China Automotive Technology and Research Center (hereinafter referred to as China Automotive Research Institute) announced the results of the last batch of C-NCAP collisions in 2014. All of the 14 models that participated in the test received a 5-star rating. For a time, there was a lot of discussion in the media. Mirror Code Assembly Of Motorcycle Mirror Code Assembly Of Motorcycle,Motorcycle Handle Grip,Motorcycle Handle Base,Motorcycle Bracket Assembly Ruian Leimeng locomotive parts Co., Ltd , https://www.leimenglocomotive.com
In order to dispel the doubts of many people, Zhao Hang, director of China Automotive Research Institute, revealed that the 40 models that participated in the crash test in 2014 were better than the batch. The main reason is that enterprises pay more attention to standards and increase active safety and passive safety. The device fills in lost points in other ways.
"In order to reflect the ultimate goal of C-NCAP collision, 'only better, no best', the 2015 version of the C-NCAP rules will be significantly adjusted to encourage companies to further improve product levels and safety technology," Zhao Hang said.
The "Securities Daily" reporter learned that this is the fourth revision of the C-NCAP rules after the three major overhauls in 2006, 2009 and 2012.
At the same time, the last batch of C-NCAP crash test also joined the domestic child safety seat evaluation project. The results showed that half of the 24 child safety seats tested were not well rated, including 12 products such as Mom Baby and Baby First, which were rated as “not recommendedâ€.
The new version of the rules has been implemented in the automotive industry since July this year. Consumers' emphasis on safety is relatively contradictory to the technological upgrading of automobile companies. However, when there is a safety evaluation standard, the "safety level" whip drives the automobile companies only. Can meet the growing security needs of consumers.
Since the official implementation of the C-NCAP Management Rules (2006 Edition) in 2006, the China Automotive Technology and Research Center has successfully tested and evaluated more than 200 models, and with the changes in vehicle products and product technology, The C-NCAP Management Rules have also been improved and improved several times, and have undergone changes in the 2006, 2009 and 2012 editions.
From the earliest 2006 edition, the positive 100% overlap rigid barrier impact test, the front 40% overlap deformable barrier impact test, and the deformable moving barrier side impact test have successively increased the child occupant protection assessment. The whipping test, the speed of the offset collision test, the score of the rear dummy and the bonus of the ESC system were added, and the C-NCAP management rules were improved and improved in stages, steps and continuously.
The reporter noticed that with the upgrade of the C-NCAP management rules over the years, the safety configuration of some of the original equipment in the middle and high-level models has gradually moved down. It is also the assembly of these safety configurations that makes the independent models continue to achieve good results in recent years. After the Global Hawk GX7 won the highest score of C-NCAP crash test in 2002, Changan CS75 defeated all joint ventures and independent models in the last batch of collision tests in 2014, not only won the first score with 59 points, but also refreshed C- The highest score in NCAP history, becoming a five-star safety champion.
It is understood that due to cost considerations, many models currently on the market are not equipped with side airbags and air curtains. Half of the last batch of crash test models in 2014 did not score full marks on the bonus points. Missing configuration. This configuration used to appear only on the more high-end models, but now it has appeared more and more in the middle and low-end models. For example, the self-owned brand Dongfeng Fengshen A30 is still equipped, which also has a high score of 54.9. Received a five-star rating.
Zhao Hang said that the ultimate goal of China Automotive Research Institute to establish a C-NCAP collision is to guide auto companies to establish the concept of 'only better, no best'. If the model obtained in 2014 is a five-star rating, if it is managed by C-NCAP in 2015. The rules can only get a four-star rating. We will improve the safety standards according to the overall product level and safety technology level of the industry, so as to reflect the leading role of the standard.
According to reports, in July last year, the C-NCAP Management Center improved some of the details on the basis of the C-NCAP Management Rules (2012 Edition), forming the "C-NCAP Management Rules (2015 Edition)" and soliciting the automotive industry. People's comments, the 2015 version of the new rules will be officially implemented after July 1, 2015.
Half of the child safety seats are under safe. China Aviation Research Institute Zhao Hang introduced that based on the last batch of 14 vehicle collision evaluations last year, the product evaluation of the vehicle child restraint system was added. The first batch of 24 vehicle child restraint system products The evaluation test was completed and the evaluation results were divided into four grades: higher than 36 for “excellentâ€, 30-36 for “goodâ€, 20-30 for “generalâ€, and 20 or less for “not recommendedâ€, respectively The car C-NCAP evaluates five stars, four stars, three stars and two stars.
The results showed that the first batch of child safety seat test was poorly evaluated, including 12 brands including Aibei, Mom Baby, Baby No.1, Jiabei'an, Beichi, Tianlun Dynasty, Mirabel, Mackay, and Lulu. There are 12 products in the safety seat with a “not recommended†rating.
Li Wei, deputy director of C-NCAP Management Center of China Automotive Research Institute, said that consumers are not recommended for the "not recommended" level of child safety seats.
"At present, the child safety seat market is mixed. The reasons for the low quality of the products include the lack of deep understanding of the technical level and safety requirements of some enterprises; the entry threshold of products is not high, the market norm is not strong, and the supervision of regulations is not enough. 3C certification has just begun, and has not yet formed a good market order and competitive environment," Zhao Hang added.
The reporter noticed that the product evaluation system for children's restraint system for vehicles will be used for children's and schoolchildren in the restricted system group. Some brands have a "general" rating for the child safety seat, while the school children's safety seat has a "not recommended" rating. Such as Ningbo Bei'anbao Children's Products Co., Ltd. Of course, there are also two “safety seats†for the Tianlun Dynasty brand produced by Zhengzhou Hongbei Baby Products Co., Ltd., which are “not recommendedâ€.
In this regard, Zhao Hang explained that the safety seats on the market are now a product suitable for children from 9 months to 12 years old. This is unscientific. "In the past, 9 months to 12 years old can be divided into one file. Understand, but the market is really open, I think that the grades should be applied to children of different ages. It is not necessarily applicable to 12 years of age when the evaluation results are adapted to 9 months. Consumers choose safe seats according to the age of children, because Height, weight and center of gravity have changed greatly in different age groups."